Parashah Ponderings

Moving Right Along with Faith

A year ago, I posted this commentary on Parashat Lech-Lecha. I can’t recall what motivated me to pursue the theme of  moving forward with life despite uncertainty. This year, however, uncertainty is everywhere. Israel faces unrest. The battle against ISIS rages on. The largest hurricane to ever hit the western hemisphere threatens Mexico. At home, politicians jockey for position in the early stages of a presidential race. Meanwhile, each of us has some kind of conflict in our lives awaiting resolution. And yet, we keep pushing forward. For many of us, it is faith that enables us to look forward to each new day, never knowing exactly what that day will bring.

Now, in focusing on the Avram (He will only become Abraham upon entering the covenant through circumcision.) this week, I do not also address the story of Hagar and Sarai (She, too, will become Sarah only after Avram enters into the covenant.), but their story is also one of faith. Sarai, barren in her old age, permits Avram to consort with her handmaiden, Hagar, in order to produce an heir. Things don’t go so well for Hagar once she conceives, and eventually she and her child, Ishmael, are sent off to the wilderness to fend for themselves. Meanwhile, Sarai at 90 miraculously gives birth to Isaac, and the narrative of our people’s founding family continues. For both Hagar and Sarai, each facing an uncertain future, God comes to provide reassurance and a promise of a better day for them and their sons.

It is God’s reassurance — or, perhaps, our faith that there is a God whose very presence makes for a better day — that first enabled our ancestors to carry on and that has since enabled the Jewish People to endure and to thrive throughout history. To endure and to thrive requires faith. As individuals and as a People, we are, indeed, the children of Abraham and Sarah.

 Lech-Lecha / פרשת לך־לך
 Genesis 12:1 – 17:27

In the Mishnah, the seminal body of rabbinic literature that developed within the first two centuries CE, the rabbis teach: “With ten tests our father Abraham was tested and he withstood them all–in order to make known how great was our father Abraham’s love [for G-d]” (Mishnah Avot 5:3). Because the rabbis of the Mishnah don’t enumerate the tests, it fell upon later authorities to speculate what they were, and by all accounts most of the trials take place in this week’s Torah portion, Lech Lecha, between chapters 12 and 17 of the Book of Genesis (Bereishit, in Hebrew). (See http://bit.ly/trialsofabraham for the Mishnah text and two interpreters’ lists of the trials.)

One trial, in particular, catches my attention this week. The parashah begins with God famously telling Abram, (God had not yet given him the name “Abraham), “Go forth from your native land and from your father’s house to the land that I will show you” (Gen. 12:1). Abram responds to this command by taking his wife, Sarai, their nephew Lot, and all their possessions on an epic journey to the land of Canaan. God’s call to “go forth” was Abraham’s first test, according to Maimonides, and he passed with flying colors. However, it is the next test that jumps out at me.

No sooner does Abram arrive in the land of Canaan and God promises “I will assign this land to your heirs” (Gen. 12:7) that we read: “There was a famine in the land…” (12:10). Apparently, Canaan was not yet the “land of milk and honey” that Abraham’s descendents would eventually find it to be. Rather, after the long journey from Haran, Abram, et al, find themselves in a barren wasteland. Imagine how shocked they must have been. How would Abram respond to this trial: stay put and inhabit the land or move on to more hospitable environs?

We receive our answer right away: “… and Abram went down to Egypt to sojourn there, for the famine was severe in the land” (ibid.). Abram chose to relocate to a land where he and his family could find physical sustenance. Perhaps he suspected from his experience of frequent drought in that part of the world that the sojourn in Egypt would be temporary, as we find in the next chapter it was. We don’t know; the text is silent. Perhaps Abram wanted to tough it out in the barren land but those around him talked him out of it. Perhaps he had no idea if his move to Egypt would be temporary or permanent. Again, we don’t know.

What we do know is that Abram had a difficult decision to make: stay or go? If he stayed, he’d be jeopardizing the welfare of his wife, nephew, slaves and livestock. If he left, he might be betraying his God, who brought him there. Or maybe Abram understood that this initial visit to the land, accompanied by building altars here and there, was just that: a visit. Maybe he knew that eventually the land would belong to his descendents, and he saw this visit as an opportunity to scout out the land, to check out the property that his children and his children’s children would, in the future, occupy and build up into a great nation. In that case, there would be no reason not to keep going. So many possibilities. What to do?

We can’t know what was going through Abram’s mind at the time, but we can imagine his angst because we’ve all been there. We’ve all found ourselves at one time or another pursuing a dream or taking a chance on something that we hoped would bring us happiness and security. And we’ve all had an experience of disappointment when the dream fell short of our expectations or the chance we took didn’t bear fruit. We’ve all been in that place where we’ve asked ourselves “What now?”

What the sages teach us is that Abraham was a man of faith. Whenever God called to him, Abraham answered. He responded to each test, never turning his back on God even though he might have been forgiven for doing so on any number of occasions, such as when God commanded him to sacrifice his son Isaac. Here, too, when Abram was faced with a “what now” situation upon landing in the midst of a famine, we can be certain that he approached his dilemma with the faith that somehow everything would work out in the end. He might not have known exactly how things would work out, but he trusted that God would take care of him and his heirs over the long haul.

When we find ourselves at a crossroads, at a place of despair with an unknown future, do we exhibit the faith of Abraham? Do we act, as did Abram, with the belief that things might be rough now but further down the road they’ll get better? Do we move on, as did Abram, even though we can’t be 100% certain if we’re making the “right” decision? Taking action in the face of uncertainty is the very definition of faith, in my opinion. Abram couldn’t know for sure where his journey would lead, nor could he be sure that God would always accompany him. He couldn’t be sure of anything, but he had faith, and that was enough.

Don’t get me wrong: exhibiting faith doesn’t mean we live without some degree of anxiety. Abraham was human and so are we. There would be something wrong with him and us if we didn’t fret over the future from time to time. I imagine Abraham lost a lot of sleep in times of trial and that he sweat profusely. Who wouldn’t? We shouldn’t think for a minute that Abraham didn’t face his future without some trepidation.

What makes Abraham’s faith so remarkable is not that he didn’t stress out in times of uncertainty — most likely, he did — but rather, as a pioneer in the belief of the One God, he had no experience to go on that would have told him that God would always be there with him through the good and the bad. And, yet, Abraham took action over and over again and found that God WAS there. It is precisely BECAUSE of Abraham’s experience that we know, no matter how bad things get, God will always accompany us on our journey. 

When we find ourselves in lands that are parched, in promised lands that promise us little more than privation, may we remember how Abram pushed forward with faith. With Divine love always with us, let us overcome our occasional fears and doubts and keep moving right along. One day we just might find ourselves dwelling in a land flowing with milk and honey.

Parashah Ponderings

Thank God for the Ark

Parashat Noach / פרשת נח
Torah Portion: Genesis 6:9 – 11:32

All the fountains of the great deep burst apart,
And the floodgates of the sky broke open.
Genesis: 7:11

This past Memorial Day my family’s apartment in Houston got flooded. Four months later and well-settled into a second floor apartment in the same complex, rain water started to come into our house from the ceiling! In May, “the fountains of the great deep” had burst apart, causing water to rise in our home from the floor up. In September, “the floodgates of the sky broke open,” and the waters came in from on high. Oy!

The analogy of our misfortune to Noah’s flood is, I admit, imperfect. There can be no comparing our loss of property to the destruction of all humanity, save one family. To equate the two would be crass. Rather, I am struck simply by the idea that in both the Noah story and in our experience, destruction seemed to come from both above and below: what an appropriate metaphor for those times when so much seems to go wrong.

I’ve yet to meet anyone who hasn’t on occasion had to face more hardship than one person should have to handle. Thus, the old saying: “God doesn’t give us more than we can bear.” That saying may feel true for most people, but to victims of the Shoah or the Inquisition or the Crusades or severe depression or terminal illness, nothing could be further from the truth. For many, catastrophe in extreme measure is too much to bear, and the suggestion that God causes such suffering is obscene.

Theological issues and unbearable suffering aside, however, there is much we can learn from the Noah story about dealing with life’s painful contingencies.

God gave Noah notice that God would send a flood that would wipe out all of creation. With that notice, God also instructed Noah to build an ark so that he and his family and the remnants of the animal kingdom that accompanied them on board could survive and repopulate the world once the waters subsided. In the end, Noah was well-equipped to survive the deluge.

It’s important to note that it was Noah who built the ark, not God. Noah was commanded by God, or perhaps, inspired by God, to build the ark. But it was Noah who created the means for his own survival. That is a crucial point.

Many times in our lives, we are Noah. We are faced with misery akin to 40 days of rain and over 300 days cooped up in an ark with loud, smelly livestock, birds, and other creatures. We just want to the misery to end, but we are blessed to have the means to ride out the storm.

We all have our own arks. They are the networks of friends and family that support us. They are the diversions that take our mind off our concerns. They are the inner reserves we’ve cultivated to take what life doles out without breaking under the weight. If we’re smart, we’ve spent a lifetime building our arks before the crises hit, not knowing, of course, when they will hit.

True, not everyone has a support network or diversions or even the inner reserves. To them, we offer our prayers. At the very least, they can take solace knowing they live in a world where someone remembers that people suffer immensely, who don’t have an ark to shelter them. Let’s not forget them. Let’s be their ark.

As we read about the tragedy that befalls early humankind, as we imagine flood waters rising from below and rain falling ceaselessly from the heavens, we imagine ourselves aboard the ark, an ark that we built with our own hands. Let us take pride in our craftsmanship and be grateful to God for all the resources at our disposal — people and things and our own internal gifts – that make up the ark, in which we weather life’s storms.

Parashah Ponderings

Dwelling in the Sukkah of Peace begins with Smashing the Idols that Block our Way

Sukkot Shabbat Chol ha-Moed – סוכות שבת חול המועד
Torah Portion: Exodus 33:12 – 34:26

On this, Shabbat Chol ha-Moed Sukkot, the intermediate Shabbat of Sukkot, the joy we are commanded to feel is tempered. How can we fully rejoice on Z’man Simchateinu – the time of our Rejoicing – knowing that only 130 miles from the synagogue I serve in Oregon nine lives have been snuffed out by a madman with a gun? How can we dwell in the sukkat shalom – the tabernacle of peace – knowing that in Israel a settler couple was shot dead in front of their young children? Where are the angels of peace bringing Israelis and Palestinians together? Where are the voices of reason who understand that common-sense legislation controlling the sale, ownership and use of guns in our country doesn’t mean denying responsible, law-abiding, people of sound mind the right to sell, own or use a gun? Is our Constitution so fragile that it can’t withstand limitations in the interest of safety?

How ironic, though, to be embroiled in old debates on this very Shabbat. After all, Sukkot is the great equalizing holiday. The Torah commands the sacrifice of 70 bulls during Sukkot, more than on any other festival. The bulls are a thanksgiving offering to God for all the nations of the world, which our ancestors imagined were 70 in number. This is the festival that celebrates God’s bounty, which is there for all humanity if only we would use our resources wisely. This is the festival that celebrates that period of Israel’s history when no one person was greater than another. No-one owned land. We were all nomads. We were all Children of God wandering through the wilderness. It is on this, the most universal of all Jewish festivals, that we should be celebrating that which unites all of us, Jew and gentile. Instead, gun shots have drowned out the sounds of rejoicing around the world and stopped us in our tracks.

In the Torah reading this week, we find these words: You must tear down their altars, smash their pillars, and cut down their sacred posts; for you must not worship any other god, because the Lord, whose name is Impassioned, is an impassioned God (Exodus 34:13-14). It seems to me that it’s about time we face up to those things in our society that we worship as our “sacred posts,” see them as the idols they are, and tear them down. Life is too precious to give ourselves over to greed and possessiveness. There are Rights and there are rights. No right entitles anyone to deny the innocent of their most essential Rights – the Right live with dignity — whether we’re talking guns or land or power. These are among the sacred posts here, in the Holy Land, and just about everywhere.

God is an Impassioned God. To be a Jew means to see ourselves as created in God’s image, to “walk in God’s ways.” We do this when we become as impassioned as we imagine God would be for what matters most in our world: human life and dignity. I pray for the day when our passion for our children outweighs our passion the idols whose worship imperils our very existence. On that day we will sit together in the sukkat shalom and take in the sounds of rejoicing. May it be so!

Wishing for peace and happiness this Shabbat,
Rabbi Dan

Parashah Ponderings

The Challenge of Imagining God

Ha’Azinu / פרשת האזינו
Deuteronomy 32:1 – 32:52

In this, the penultimate Torah portion of the yearly cycle, Moses offers an ode to God that has come to be known as “The Song of Moses.” The song contains a number of rich, evocative epithets for God, inviting us to expand our understanding of God beyond “Ruler” and “Parent,” the predominant images of God spoken of in the High Holy Day liturgy. Of course, the way we envision the Divine is inherently limited by the language that shapes the way we think.

In one of his final essays on the weekly reading, Rabbi Shai Held addresses this very issue. In his scholarly and insightful article entitled “Hearing the Whisper: God and the Limits of Language,” Rabbi Held addresses the paradox of our need to name and envision God, on one hand, and God’s utter transcendence and ineffability, on the other hand. As we renew our relationship to the Holy One at the start of this new year, I encourage you to read Rabbi Held’s article and to examine your own images of God and their limitations.

You may read and download Rabbi Held’s article here: Hearing the Whisper: God and the Limits of Language.

Parashah Ponderings

Choose to Be There on That Day

Parashat Nitzavim / פרשת נצבים
Torah Portion: Deuteronomy 29:9 – 30:20

You stand this day all of you before the Lord your God; your captains of your tribes, your elders, and your officers, with all the men of Israel, Your little ones, your wives, and your stranger who is in your camp, from the hewer of your wood to the drawer of your water; That you should enter into covenant with the Lord your God, and into his oath, which the Lord your God makes with you this day; That he may establish you today for a people to himself, and that he may be to you a God, as he has said to you, and as he has sworn to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob. And not with you alone will I make this covenant and this oath; But with him who stands here with us this day before the Lord our God, and also with him who is not here with us this day…  Deuteronomy 29:9-14

In this week’s parashah, Moses’ gathers all of Israel, from the most esteemed leaders to the lowliest laborers, in order for them to formally enter into the covenant with God. This is the same covenant (with minor variations) which God had made with their parents and grandparents 40 years earlier at Mt. Sinai. The Sinai generation had uttered those famous words of consent: “All that God has said, we will do and obey.” (Exodus 24:7). But it was also the Sinai generation that, because they sent spies into Canaan to see if they’d be able to conquer the people there, was doomed to wander for 40 years in the wilderness and to die out before entering the land that God had promised Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Those who now stand before Moses “this day” have followed the faith of their forebears for four decades but have never actually given their consent to the covenant. Now, standing on the border of what will become Eretz Yisrael, the 2nd and 3rd generations after the exodus from Egypt enter into the covenant with “heaven and earth” as witnesses.

In his weekly commentary on the parashah, Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, former chief rabbi of Great Britain, explains that through this ceremony Moses “ensures that this and the next  generation  and  all  future  generations  of Israel will  be bound  by  it.  He  wanted  no-one  to  be  able  to  say,  ‘G-d made  a  covenant  with  my  ancestors  but  not  with  me.  I did  not  give  my  consent.  I  was  not  there.  I  am  not bound.’  That  is  why  Moses  says:  It  is  not  with  you alone  that  I  am  making  this  sworn  covenant,  but  with whoever  is  standing  here  with  us  today  before  the  Lord our  G-d,  and  with  whoever  is  not  here  with  us  today” (Deut. 29:13-14).

The question is, however, why does Moses address not only those standing before him but also “him who is not here with us this day”? After all, can the unborn hear him and agree to the terms of the covenant with all its laws and statutes, blessings and curses? As Rabbi Sacks himself says, “There can be no obligation without consent.” In what sense, then, does Moses oblige future generations to remain faithful to the covenant?

Rabbi Sacks finds an answer to this question later in the parashah: “I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse; therefore choose life, that both you and your seed may live” (30:19). Choose. Those present, despite being told they are part of the covenant, are given a choice to abide by its terms or not. The former will bring blessings upon them; the latter, curses. All will go well if the people embrace God and the mitzvot. Should they turn away from God, however, misery will befall them.

If the present generation has a choice to make, so do subsequent generations. Rabbi Sacks points out that Jews have made the choice to be faithful to the covenant over and over again throughout their history. During the Inquisition, many Jews converted to Christianity but still remained faithful and practiced their Judaism secretly. In Nazi extermination camps, Jews reaffirmed their faith despite the horrors they witnessed that might have caused them to abandon God and Judaism altogether. In our own day, by and large, we face no obstacles internally or externally to jettisoning our Jewish heritage and going incognito, perhaps embracing another faith tradition. And, yet, most Jews still choose to identify as descendants of those who entered the Promised Land with Joshua, even if they don’t practice ritually or allow Torah-based values to inform their behaviors.

How were our ancestors able to choose Judaism under the Inquisition or during the Shoah? How are we able to make that choice? By watching and learning from those who come before them. When Moses says he is speaking not only to those present in his day but to those yet to be born, we ought not to take him literally. Rather, the message for his generation is that it will be their responsibility to ensure that their successors learn mitzvot and are given the opportunity to choose either a life of meaning or a life devoid of meaning, a life of connection to God and humanity or a life of utter loneliness. It is toward the former that we, like Moses’s listeners and all the generations before us, should aspire to lead our children and our children’s children.

We are the inheritors of a magnificent tradition, one with the potential to illumine our lives and repair the world. Each day we choose to embrace that tradition, we give life to the souls of the men and women who so lovingly passed the tradition onto us throughout the millennia. We give life to the people who stood with Moses on “that day.” When our lives become intertwined with theirs, we can say that we, too, were sworn into the covenant on “that day.” It is incumbent upon us to ensure that future generations stand with Moses as well.

Parashah Ponderings

Best of Parashah Ponderings: What Does Gathering Eggs Have to Do with Anything?

Parashat Ki Teitzei / פרשת כי־תצא

Torah Portion: Deuteronomy 21:10 – 25:19

This weeks Torah portion, Parashat Ki Tetzei, contains more mitzvot (commandments) than any other parashah: 74, to be precise. Mitzvot can be divided into two categories. The first category is called “ben adam l’havero” or “between one person and another person.” These mitzvot include ethical instruction that guides us in our treatment of our fellow human being in business, at home, and out in the world. An example of this would be treat all your children equally (Deut. 21:15). Mitzvot ben adam l’havero also comprise civil and criminal legislation that tell us what to do if someone should commit a crime, kidnapping, for instance: If a man is found to have kidnapped a fellow Israelite, enslaving him or selling him, that kidnapper shall die; thus you will sweep out evil from your midst (Deut. 24:7)

The next set of mitzvot are “ben adam lamakom,” or “between a person and God.” These mitzvot deal mostly with ritual, Shabbat, keeping kosher, and the like. They address issues of how we worship, celebrate and honor God. An example of a mitzvah between a person and God from elsewhere in the Torah would be to keep the Sabbath holy.

In the midst of the litany of mitzvot this week, all of which pertain to ben adam l’havero, we find one that, on the face of it, doesn’t seem to fit into either category:

If, along the road, you chance upon a bird’s nest, in any tree or on the ground, with fledglings or eggs and the mother sitting over the fledglings or on the eggs, do not take the mother together with her young. Let the mother go, and take only the young, in order that you may fare well and have a long life (Deut. 22:6)

This mitzvah clearly deals with how we treat animals. It doesn’t tell us how to interact with another person, nor does it address how we relate to God. Do we need a third category of mitzvah for this mitzvah and others like it?

I would contend that this mitzvah is, in fact, a mitzvah ben adam l’havero and ben adam lamakom. How so? In directing us to shoo away the mother before taking her little ones or her unhatched eggs, this and similar mitzvot inculcate in us a sense of compassion and empathy. If we should care enough to shoo away the mother so she won’t see us taking her progeny, even more so should we care about the feelings of human beings. From this mitzvah about ethical treatment of animals comes an awareness of how ethically to treat human beings.

In what way is this mitzvah about us and God? By shooing away the mother, we protect her from being captured or hurt and we allow her to go on reproducing. In the future, some of the mother’s eggs will hatch and bear fledglings, who themselves will live long lives and also reproduce. Thus, this mitzvah enables us to be stewards of God’s creation and so deservedly belongs in the category of ben adam lamakom.

Ki Tetzei reminds us that all the natural world of which we are a part is integral to our existence as human beings. The way we interact with the world reveals something about how we interact with each other. Mitzvot pertaining to our treatment of animals, we have seen, also shape our treatment of human beings by sensitizing us to the feelings of creatures around us. At the same time, our relationship with nature also reveals something about our relationship to God. Any mitzvot that guide us in our interactions with nature, likewise encourage us to be mindful of our partnership with God, while also helping us realize that all the universe truly is God’s kingdom. As citizens of this kingdom, we ought to strive through mitzvot to build a world of love and trust for all, including for those who soar in the skies above.

Parashah Ponderings

Set a king over yourself.

Parashat Shoftim / פרשת שופטים
Torah Portion: Deuteronomy 16:18 – 21:9

If, after you have entered the land that the Lord your God has assigned to you, and taken possession of it and settled in it, you decide, “I will set a king over me, as do all the nations about me,” you shall be free to set a king over yourself, one chosen by the Lord your God. (Deuteronomy 17:14-15)

Any child who has ever attended Hebrew school will tell you that King David is a hero. He slew Goliath. He wrote beautiful poetry. From David’s lineage will eventually come the messiah. So great a hero is David that we sing ecstatically about him: many Jews learn the song “David Melekh Yisrael – David King of Israel” early in their lives and remember the hand motions that accompany the song well into their upper years. Given what we learn about David and how much we celebrate him, one would think that his anointing was the greatest thing that ever happened to Israel.

Our reverence for King David and, to some extent, for King Solomon and other kings of Israel notwithstanding, according to the Torah God is actually quite ambivalent about Israel having a king at all. In I Samuel 8, the elders of Israel press the prophet Samuel to appoint a king over Israel, which displeases Samuel and causes him to pray to God. God responds, “Listen to what the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king, as they’ve done time and again since I brought them out of Egypt. Listen to them, but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will claim as his rights.” By appointing a king, Israel was rejecting God’s sovereignty and taking its life as a nation into its own hands. God acquiesces to the people’s demand for a king reluctantly, to say the least.

Our tradition’s ambivalence over the inauguration of an earthly king over Israel serves as a backdrop to Deuteronomy 17:14-20, which we find in this week’s reading. Because the Torah portrays God as not so keen on the idea of competing with an earthly king for Israel’s allegiance, God lays out four criteria by which Israel must determine who will be king. Paradoxically, while God guides the people in choosing whom to “set over them,” the king they choose will ultimately be “one chosen by the Lord your God” (17:15). If Israel heeds God’s directive in choosing a king, God will ultimately approve and things will go well with Israel. On the other hand, if Israel spurns God’s directive and chooses a king who doesn’t fit the criteria, God will let Israel know that this king was not one that God chose, and as a result, things won’t go so well for Israel.

What are the four criteria? First, the king cannot be a foreigner. A foreign king might not serve in the best interests of Israel and might even ensnare Israel into worshipping foreign gods. Second, the king must not have too many horses. A king obsessed with owning lots of horses might be driven to sell his own people to acquire more and more horses, thus returning Israelites to servitude in Egypt, which happened to be a great exporter of horses in the ancient near east. Third, the king must not have too many wives, lest his personal, familial concerns divert his attention from matters of governance. Fourth, he must not be a person of excessive wealth. Too much wealth might be corrupting. These criteria make perfect sense. Indeed, together they suggest something about the character of king that God would want to reign over Israel, namely loyal, humble, honest and clear-thinking.

Guiding Israel’s choice of a king, however, is insufficient to allay God’s concern over how the king will reign once on the throne. The king might measure up to each of the four criteria and still fail to govern Israel as God would like. Thus, God commands that once the king is seated on his throne, “he shall write a copy of the Torah for himself” to keep by his side, “to read so that he may learn to fear God, to observe faithfully every word of God’s Teaching” (17:18-19). This Torah was likely the book of Deuteronomy, “a repetition of the laws and history known from the earlier books of the Torah” and not the entire scroll of Torah that we read from today (Etz Hayim Torah and Commentary, New York, The Rabbinical Assembly, 2001, p. 1092).

We might be impressed that the king himself actually writes a book of Torah, which, to be sure, is a matter of debate. But what is truly impressive, to my mind, is the idea that the king studies and is guided by God’s teachings and governs not merely by whim or expediency. The king is expected to be learned of Torah and faithful to the God of Israel and the values that God represents. What a concept!

Now, this isn’t the place to go over the history of Israel’s kingship. I invite you to read the Books of Kings for an introduction. Suffice it to say that some kings knew their Torah and were men of faith and some did not and were not. Some kings tolerated idol worship, and other kings cracked down on it. God approved of the latter while bringing the former to terrible ends.

In the United States, prospective nominees for president have hit the streets and are trying to convince us why they should be president. I wonder what it would be like to hold them to the criteria of character implicit in this week’s Torah reading. Can we find two candidates for president who are loyal, humble, honest and clear-thinking? I continue to hold out hope.

Moreover, I wonder what will become of the winner once he or she takes office. What book of “Torah” will that person read and study? The Constitution? The Bible? Which Bible? The newspapers? Which newspapers? What set of values will guide our president, if any? We cannot know these things for sure. Indeed, what we learn from this week’s Torah portion is that even when we we’ve elected the one person in whom we have the most trust, we have no assurance that the person will govern as we had hoped he or she would. Maybe we should expect our nation’s leader to do as the Torah literally suggests: sit down, write out a copy of “Torah,” and keep it by his or her side every day while under oath.

 

Parashah Ponderings

Best of Parashah Ponderings: Israel’s Travels: A Lesson in Appreciation and Gratitude

(This devar torah originally appeared on July 23, 2014 for Parashat Masei.)

Parashat Maatot-Masei / פרשת מטות- מסעי

Torah Portion: Numbers 30:2 – 36:13

This week’s Torah reading, Parashat Masei, begins with a decidedly dry listing of Israel’s “marches” during their 40-year journey from Egypt to the Promised Land. Moses records in writing each of Israel’s 42 resting places without much comment, save a few geographical reference points: “They set out from X and encamped at Y.” There isn’t a single account of what happened to Israel in any of these places! Many commentators, therefore, wonder what the Torah is trying to teach us by the inclusion of this sparse travelogue.

Two responses to this puzzle lead us toward an appreciation of both the simple and miraculous in life: the everyday gifts, such as food, water, and rest, that are critical for survival as well as the extraordinary moments, such as birth, the discovery of great insights, the escape from places of despair. The daily prayers of the Jewish people condition an awareness of and gratitude for all such gifts. The majority of us who don’t pray on a daily basis, however, must find our own ways of being mindful and grateful. In either case, appreciation and gratitude are Jewish attitudes whose import is conveyed in our earliest sacred literature.

The preeminent 11th century French commentator, Rashi, cites an early 11th century scholar known as Moses haDarshan, in suggesting that the point of the recording the marches here at the end of the Book of Numbers is “to demonstrate how kindly God acted toward the Israelites. Even though God had decreed that God would drag the Israelites endlessly through the wilderness, you cannot say that they were simply dragged from place to place for 40 years with no respite.”[1] In 40 years, Israel stopped 42 times, meaning they enjoyed extended periods, even years, when they weren’t marching at all. Our sages recognized that God allowed our ancestors to rest along the way from Egypt to Israel.

The journey entailed much more than year after year of moving large numbers of people and their belongings, punctuated by warfare, hunger and thirst. In their drive to reach Israel, our ancestors also were able to establish something like a normal way of life, build community ties, and grow their families. God granted them rest, too, not just on Shabbat but in between marches. Thus, while the 40 year period of wandering was first presented by God as a punishment against the generation of Egypt, who doubted God would be with them when it came time to take possession of the land,[2] in reality, the years of wandering offered experiences that made the journey more bearable and better prepared Israel for its future as a nation in its own land. Thank God for all theses little things that largely go unstated in the Torah.

What of all the miracles that God performed for Israel in their years of wandering: the manna, the quail, the water from rocks, the victories in battle against all odds? Maimonides, in his 12th century work Guide for the Perplexed, argues that the list of marches is really intended to remind future generations of all these wonders that God performed for Israel. Overtime, without a record of Israel’s route, descendants of Israel and the other nations might come to think that God led Israel through “settled areas or in places where agriculture was possible” and diminish the role of the Divine in supporting Israel on its difficult journey.[3] Moses, however, ensures that future generations will know that without the grace of God Israel would not have been able to survive the 40-year sojourn. Maimonides indicates the Torah itself shows that the places recorded by Moses were unsuitable for human habitation.[4] They were isolated, arid, inhospitable places. The logical observer could only conclude that God provided for Israel all those years.

Both sets of commentary – one emphasizing the gift of respite, the other Divine grace – teach that this odd recital of place names reminds us to appreciate and give thanks for all that God did for our ancestors. Rashi and Moses haDarshan draw our attention to a detail that we might otherwise overlook, that Israel wasn’t constantly on the move. Rather, Israel enjoyed periods of rest and recuperation on their way to the Holy Land. On the other hand, Maimonides, as cited by Nachmanides in his commentary, wants us to remember that God did great things for Israel to enable them to survive those 40 years. Maimonides wants to preempt any naysayers who would one day deny God’s intervention on behalf of Israel.

The lesson for us is clear. Just as God was present for our ancestors in both the mundane and the miraculous, God is present for us. After all, our ancestors’ God is our God and is as present for us in our day as in theirs. In the years between the Exodus and entering the Land of Israel, God saw that Israel’s need to rest and to grow as a people was tended to and that, when times got tough, Israel would have the wherewithal to make it through.

Don’t we have similar needs? Everyday we benefit from God’s goodness through the presence of things we tend to take for granted: clean air, fresh water, sleep. From time to time we also face tremendous challenges and experience life-altering events: recovery from illness, witnessing the birth of a great-grandchild, discovering new truths about our universe. Let us truly appreciate each and every one of these gifts and find our own ways to give thanks. If you need help, don’t hesitate to engage in Judaism’s ancient practice of prayer.

[1] Michael Carasik. The Commentators’ Bible: Numbers. (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2011), p. 238.

[2] Numbers 14:20-35.

[3] Carasik, p. 238. Nachmanides here cites Maimonides.

[4] http://jewishthoughtandbeyond.blogspot.com/2008/07/maimonides-on-masei.html accessed 7/23/2014.

Parashah Ponderings

Chukat and the Game of Life

Parashat Chukat / פרשת חקת

Torah Portion: Numbers 19:1 – 22:1

This week’s parashah reads like a board game, with the Israelites moving ahead a space, hitting misfortune, moving back several spaces, and then getting lucky and moving forward toward the finish line. The opening chapter of the parashah, rather than fitting in with the game itself, feels like the game’s complicated instructions that will only make sense once you start playing the game. Much happens to the Israelites in this parashah board game for better and for worse, and by the time it is over we’ve discovered an important lesson about dealing with life’s travails.

Let’s start with the instructions. Parashat Chukat begins with the bizarre details of the ritual of the “red heifer” (Numbers 19:1-22) through which one is spiritually cleansed after having become spiritually contaminated by coming into close contact with a corpse. Part of this ritual requires someone to burn the heifer, reducing it to ashes, and as that person executes his responsibilities, he and the presiding priest are made impure. That is, their contact with the ashes of the heifer that will cleanse another person will, in the end, defile them and require them to wash their clothes and bathe their bodies in order to become clean once again.

It’s hard to make sense of this ritual. Why does it unfold the way it does? Why do the ashes purify one person and contaminate another? What did the heifer look like in actuality, and where did it come from? We cannot know the whys and wherefores of the red heifer ritual for sure because it could only be performed in the Temple in Jerusalem by the priests, and, of course, neither the Temple nor the priests themselves longer exist. It’s all a mystery beyond our comprehension, which, the rabbis teach, is exactly the point: sometimes God commands us to do things we do not understand, but the idea is to do them out of faith without questioning. Similarly, I’ve read and heard the instructions to complex board games that I simply could not understand, but I had faith that somehow by following the instructions the game would proceed as it was supposed to and things would begin to make sense. The only problem with the Red Heifer game, though, is that it’s a “game” that can’t be played anymore! How frustrating!

So, with the instructions/prelude behind us, we see that the Israelites move one step forward to Kadesh in the “wilderness of Zin” (Num. 20:1). Just as they are settling in, however, Miriam, the prophetess and Moses’ sister, dies. Then, things really spiral out of control: the Israelites find themselves without water (20:2); Moses strikes a rock twice to produce water, despite God’s explicit instruction to simply “order the rock to yield its water” (20:6-11); Moses and Aaron get the news from God that neither of them will get to cross into the Promised Land (20:12-12); the king of Edom refuses to give the Israelites passage through his territory and turns them away. In the span of just 21 verses, Israel hits upon hard times and their forward movement is halted. Unfortunately, their next advance from Kadesh to Mount Hor (20:22) is followed by a string of more setbacks: Aaron dies (20:28); Israel is attacked by the king of Arad (21:1); serpents attack the people, killing many of them (21:6). By this point, it looks like the Israelites are on a losing path.

Just then, a miracle occurs and the forward momentum kicks in once again: Israel comes upon a well at Beer and breaks out in song (21:16-20). Refreshed, Israel defeats in succession the Amorites (21:21-32) and King Og of Bashan (21:33-35), neither of whom granted Israel the right to pass through their territory in peace. Finally, the game ends with Israel making it as far as “the steppes of Moab, across the Jordan from Jericho” (22:1). Victory! (Well, almost. We’ll have to wait until the Book of Joshua for the next installment of the game.)

What are we to learn from Israel’s experience in this “game”? There are two lessons. First, life can be messy, complicated and hard to understand from time to time, but we must strive to accept our reality and keep our sights set on what we deem truly important. In the case of the Red Heifer, biblical Israel enacted this ritual with all its mystery and believed that being do so they could deal with death effectively. They neither refused to follow God’s strange commandment nor stopped caring for their dead. They accepted the ritual of the Red Heifer at face value, and this allowed them to carry on. We, too, don’t need to understand our reality all the time, but we do need to work with what we’ve been given in order to move forward.

The second lesson is simply that, while life is full of setbacks, the setbacks should neither define us nor deter us from striving for success. In Chukat, lots of bad stuff happens to the Israelites. They grumble and say they wish to be back in Egypt. However, they eventually find their stride, gain confidence, and enjoy a series of major successes. The Israelites do not give up on God, and God does not give up on them.

Had we chosen to read the parashah only through the death of Aaron, we never would have come to the well at Beer. We certainly wouldn’t have seen Moses and the Israelites camping in the steppes of Moab. Were we to give up on life with every defeat — floods, acts of hatred, the death of loved ones — we would never be able to experience the great blessings God has in store for us.

As we play the game of life, it behooves us to assess our circumstances realistically, come to peace with where we’re at and keep on playing. Though we may suffer setbacks from time to time, let us recover quickly and prepare ourselves to keep progressing toward the winner’s circle, which is where, after all, we belong.

Parashah Ponderings

Running to Save the World

 Korachפרשת קורח

 Numbers 16:1 – 18:32

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Get away from among this congregation, that I may consume them as in a moment.” And they fell upon their faces. And Moses said to Aaron, “Take a censer, and put fire in it from the altar, and put on incense, and go quickly to the congregation, and make an atonement for them; for anger has come out from the Lord; the plague has begun.” And Aaron took as Moses commanded, and ran into the midst of the congregation; and, behold, the plague had begun among the people; and he put on incense, and made an atonement for the people. And he stood between the dead and the living; and the plague was stopped. And those who died in the plague were fourteen thousand and seven hundred, beside those who died about the matter of Korah. And Aaron returned to Moses to the door of the Tent of Meeting; and the plague was stopped.

Numbers 17: 9-15

At the heart of Parashat Korach stands an uprising against Moses and Aaron by two groups of rebels led by Korach, on one hand, and by Dathan and Abiram on the other. To show that G-d has, indeed, chosen Moses and Aaron to lead the Israelites, G-d lets loose his wrath on the rebels first by creating a giant crator in the Earth that swallows up the main group of rebels, then by incinerating another group, and finally by causing a deadly plague to dessimate the entire congregation of Israel, who by now was “murmuring” against Moses and Aaron for having brought so much death upon them. The entire tragic drama bolsters the legitimact of Moses and Aaron as the rightful leaders of Israel and, in the hands of commentators from the rabbinic sages to modern scholars and theologians, comes to teach valuable lessons about the nature of holiness and what constitutes debate “for the sake of heaven.”

Though an argument can be made that the community’s gripes and Korach’s challenge to Moses and Aaron are reasonable given the circumstances, the Torah’s stance is clear: Moses, Aaron and the kohanim are the good guys; those who challenge them are the bad guys. Thus, I find Moses’ and Aaron’s responses to the plague that God that brings about to silence the congregation quite remarkable. Whereas Moses had previously argued with God not to obliterate Israel both when the Israelites created a golden calf to worship and when scouts instilled doubt in the minds of Israel that they would be able to conquer the land of Canaan and possess it, here Moses doesn’t engage God at all. Rather, Moses directly intervenes on behalf of the very community that threatens him. By commanding Aaron to enter into the midst of the community with a fire pan with incense, Moses wants to stop halt the plague and save hundreds of thousand of lives. He may be at wits’ end with those he is charged to lead, but he refuses to abandon them. Instead, he takes the moral high ro

Aaron follows Moses lead. He, too, hurries to save Israel. One moment, Moses tells him to “go quickly to the congregation. The next moment, Aaron runs “into the midst of the congregation.” By specifying that Aaron ran and not simply “went quickly” as Moses had bade him, we see Aaron’s eagerness, too, to do right by human kind.

After witnessing the death of 14,700 Israelites, Moses and Aaron could throw up their hands in resignation or hold themselves above Israel in self-righteousness. But that’s not what they do. They follow their consciences to save life, and by doing so, serve as role models for selfless courage. In our day and age, we need such role models.

As we scan the news this week, we read about countless scenes of horror that call us to emulate Moses and Aaron: a senseless act of hatred at a black church in Charleston; the advance of radical Islamists in the Syria and Iraq; acts of nature disrupting and taking life; and so many more. We have the same choicea that our biblical leaders had: Do we argue with God to stop the destruction? Do we close our eyes and simply accept what is happening? Do we bask in the satisfaction that all this is happening somewhere far from us? Or do we act?

Moses and Aaron could not revive the thousands of dead Israelites, but they could insert themselves into the world they saw under attack to try to stop the madness. I don’t believe most of us as individuals can stop racists, bigots and extremists from wreaking havoc. We certainly can’t prevent waters from rising over the banks of rivers and bayous and pushing families out of their homes. But we do have the power to speak out against hatred, to encourage our government to fight ISIS, to support victims of natural disasters as they occur. There’s much we can do if we would only heed the call of our conscience.

Prayer itself wasn’t enough for Moses and Aaron to truly make a difference in their world, nor was arguing with God. When it came time to make a difference, they ran quickly to the aid not of friends and allies but of those who wished them ill. So, too, must we seize this moment to run quickly to change our world for all those in it, whether friends or strangers, whether we like them or not.